{"id":30809,"date":"2017-07-04T07:55:00","date_gmt":"2017-07-04T11:55:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/coe-study\/insight-no16-2\/"},"modified":"2026-08-06T17:45:19","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T21:45:19","slug":"insight-no16","status":"publish","type":"coe-study","link":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/coe-study\/insight-no16\/","title":{"rendered":"Indigenous Consent and Natural Resource Extraction"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li>La controverse entourant l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation du consentement pr\u00e9alable, libre et \u00e9clair\u00e9 (CPLE) comme un \u00ab droit de veto \u00bb est un obstacle majeur \u00e0 la mise en \u0153uvre de la D\u00e9claration des Nations unies sur les droits des peuples autochtones.<\/li>\n<li>Afin de d\u00e9bloquer l\u2019impasse, nous proposons une approche relationnelle du CPLE qui repose sur la reconnaissance de l\u2019autorit\u00e9 inh\u00e9rente des peuples autochtones sur leurs terres ancestrales et qui engage les gouvernements \u00e0 consid\u00e9rer ces derniers comme des partenaires dans le processus de prise de d\u00e9cision.<\/li>\n<li>Ce processus d\u00e9cisionnel doit reposer sur la d\u00e9lib\u00e9ration au sein des communaut\u00e9s autochtones.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/infographic-insight-no16.png\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-8448\" src=\"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/07\/infographic-insight-no16.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A mutually beneficial model for decision-making in land and resource development in Canada requires a new approach \u2013 one that commits governments to recognizing Indigenous peoples\u2019 inherent jurisdiction and fully engages them in the decision-making process, says a new paper from the Institute for Research on Public Policy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":10252,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"site-category":[],"section":[],"site-tag":[],"class_list":["post-30809","coe-study","type-coe-study","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coe-study\/30809","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coe-study"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/coe-study"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coe-study\/30809\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30810,"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coe-study\/30809\/revisions\/30810"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30809"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"site-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/site-category?post=30809"},{"taxonomy":"section","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/section?post=30809"},{"taxonomy":"site-tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/irpporg.kinsta.cloud\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/site-tag?post=30809"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}